Cogito et scio invicem . . .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phlogiston

1       In the seventeen hundreds phlogiston was thought to be an unobservable substance which was the counterbalance of calx when things burned. If a substance was dephlogisticated, then it had lost its flammable phlogiston and was now in the more essential form, its calx. It was Lavoisier, the Father of Modern Chemistry, who refuted the phlogiston theory of combustion.  Lavoisier in 1789 published a book, Traité élémentaire de chemie, in which he purported his Oxygen Theory to refute the ruling idea of the existence of a substance called phlogiston, and which had been used for almost a century up to that time to explain how substances burn.  Two other scientists in the time of Lavoisier had isolated oxygen chemically, Carl Scheele in 1772 and Joseph Priestley in 1774.  Scheele had called the substance 'fire air.'  Priestley called the substance he had isolated by directing sunlight through a lens onto mercurius calcinatus (mercuric oxide, a red powder) so as to heat it, "dephlogisticated air."   The equation for Priestley's experiment would be as follows:

                                2HgO(s)  +  heat  --->   2Hg(l)   +   O2  

     Lavoisier developed an accurate scale which could measure quantities of mass in the range of the nearest 10-4 g (to 0.0005g).  He then performed several experiments with combustion, and found that there was a conservation of mass ultimately, that the mass of the reactants and the mass of the products remained unchanged by the combustion.  This became part of the key to his newly found understanding that air was comprised of oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide.  In a meeting with Priestley he was told of Priestley's discovery of dephlogisticated air in the experiment Priestley had performed.  This had inspired Lavoisier to rethink air not as losing a given substance in the process of combustion, the purported substance called phlogiston, as much as being comprised of one or more substances which had reactive abilities.  Indeed, Lavoisier coined the term 'oxygen' to describe the substance which was most active in the combustion events he had witnessed.  Lavoisier was astute enough as an empirical scientist to recognize that the oxidation of metals and the respiration of living things, as well as combustion, all were examples of the same type of reaction which he had been able to analyze through the primary tool of accurate measurements in the weight of reactants and products in his combustion experiments.  Along with his theory of oxygen Lavoisier established the nature of an element for the annals of chemistry, whereby an element was defined as a substance which could not be broken down further.  He named 33 such elements, and which were described in his book, Traité élémentaire de chemie.  

     Lavoisier's great breakthrough in refuting the theory of phlogiston came when he recognized that a substance, the liquid mercury, could change state upon being heated in a closed container to solid mercuric oxide, reducing the volume of air in so doing; then it could be changed back with further heating from that so-called "calx" of mercury, to  make the explanation of phlogiston now untenable.  Phlogiston could be released upon the first heating, but not put back when the 'calx' was re-heated to give the original liquid mercury plus O2, since according to the existing theory of the nature of phlogiston such a replenishment should have been deemed impossible.

 

                                                                

 

 

 

Send mail to mstark@starkscience.org with questions or comments about this web site.
© 2003 - 2007  Science for the Knowing
Last modified: May 08, 2007